PMI PMP Exam Dumps

A cross-functional team is a group of people with different skills and expertise who work together to achieve a common goal. A cross-functional team is beneficial for agile projects, as it enables the team to deliver value faster, collaborate better, and adapt to changing requirements and customer feedback. When a planned activity becomes more complex, the best approach is to have the cross-functional team work together to complete the activity, as this allows the team to leverage their diverse skills and knowledge, share ideas and solutions, and overcome challenges and risks. The team can also communicate and coordinate more effectively, and ensure that the quality and scope of the activity are met. This is part of the Execute Project Work process, which aims to perform the activities that produce the project deliverables. The other options are not the best choices because they do not utilize the full potential and capacity of the cross-functional team. The team facilitator gets support from external team members (option A) may introduce more complexity and dependency, as the external team members may not be familiar with the project context, objectives, and processes. The team members bring in a specialist to help them (option B) may be helpful, but it may also create a bottleneck and dependency, as the specialist may not be available or accessible when needed. The product owner moves it to the product backlog (option C) may delay the delivery and value of the activity, as the product backlog is a prioritized list of features and requirements that the team will work on in future iterations. It may also create dissatisfaction and frustration among the team and the customer.

Perform a risk assessment and define a risk response action plan.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 11.4, one of the tools and techniques for performing qualitative risk analysis is risk categorization. This involves grouping potential risks by common root causes or other criteria, such as project phases, sources, or effects. The project manager should use this technique to identify the most significant risks that are affecting the project performance, and prioritize them for further analysis or action. The project manager should then develop appropriate risk responses to mitigate or avoid the negative impacts of the risks, or exploit or enhance the positive impacts of the opportunities. The project manager should also update the risk register and other project documents accordingly. The other options are not the first steps to take, as they do not address the root causes of the risks, and may not be feasible or effective in the given situation. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 11.4; PMP Practice Exam, question 94.

Ensure that relevant stakeholders and expectations are identified and assess the component delay

The project manager should ensure that relevant stakeholders and expectations are identified and assess the component delay. This is because the project manager needs to communicate with the stakeholders about the impact of the delay on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, and quality, and seek their feedback and support. The project manager also needs to evaluate the component delay and its root cause, and determine the best course of action to address the issue. Asking for expedited delivery, performing a detailed analysis, or proposing a new design are possible actions that the project manager may take after ensuring stakeholder identification and assessment, depending on the outcome of the evaluation. However, they are not the best actions to take in this situation, as they may not address the stakeholder needs and expectations, or may introduce unnecessary changes or risks to the project. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 513, section 10.1.1.1 (Stakeholder Identification); page 518, section 10.1.3.1 (Stakeholder Register); page 520, section 10.2.1.1 (Stakeholder Analysis); page 524, section 10.2.3.1 (Stakeholder Engagement Assessment Matrix); page 526, section 10.3.1.1 (Communication Requirements Analysis)